Showing posts with label collage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label collage. Show all posts

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Raw, cooked or just blanched?

I have always been very puzzled about the raw and the cooked. Am I sitting on a tree or is this assemblage of wood a chair?
- Richard Wentworth, statement in Art Photography Now, Susan Bright, 2005.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Photographically-aided Readymades

That sentence [typically words written on an object. ie. a snow shovel on which Marcel wrote 'In advance of the broken arm.'] instead of describing the object like a title was meant to carry the mind of the spectator towards other regions more verbal.

Sometimes I would add a graphic detail of presentation which, in order to satisfy my craving for alliterations, would be called 'Readymade aided.'

... then later ...
Since the tubes of paint used by an artist are manufactured and readymade products we must conclude that all the paintings in the world are "Readymades aided" and also works of assemblage.

- Marcel Duchamp (1961)

Source: Collage Museum

I guess where I'm going with this search for snippets is that I'm trying to find parallels to this idea that straight photography is a form of assemblage. This is equally so when other art forms are viewed 'appropriately'.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Opposable thumbs...

Yet more gems in The Australian as Christopher Allen discusses the work of Rosalie Gascoigne at the NGV.
...the crux of the aesthetic experience lies in recognising the image simultaneously as the representation of something in the world and as an object made of pigments, or lines and washes of ink, or coloured pieces of stone and glass.

The aesthetic meaning ... lies in the ineffable tension and vibration between the patches and lines and strokes and the figure evoked; it consists in the way we see the material form become the subject, without ceasing to be itself.

To make something into something else is an act of understanding, as when reasoning shapes intuitions into a coherent structure of ideas and words.

These principles, fundamental to an understanding of Gascoigne's work, are epitomised in the early assemblage 'Grove' (1984) ... Could anything be, on the face of it, less like a grove of trees? ... It is from such distance and unlikeness that likeness surprisingly arises.

Then later...
It was this [Ikebana] training that sharpened her sense of the aesthetic qualities of things and power of assemblage. And Chinese and Japanese theories of painting are more familiar than our own with the idea that a brush mark can become a rock or a leaf while remaining a brush mark.

One of a Kind
Christopher Allen
The Weekend Australian
January 24-25, 2009.


I'm not sure what triggered it, although the article definitely helped, but I've fallen for the idea of exploring an approach with photography as a form of conceptual assemblage. This is not the same of the phenomena of the found but rather explores the idea of that which is imaged as brush as opposed to being an object or collection thereof.

There is an extra element when compared to the work of Gascoigne - the photographer would make the boxes, then destroy them and then reassemble them again - but nonetheless, the approach is as much about manipulating that which you have into what you want via the tools available.

The thoughts are a bit scattered at the moment - as you may have noticed! - but I will sit down and work out a better explanation of what I mean over the next week or so.